Agent Loop

Same exploration path · Agent core

Jev made decision models a category. This survey groups a dozen-plus hosted and open models by how they work, checks vendor claims against Decision Index, JevBench and Red Hat's tests, explains why public scores, latency and "calibration" don't compare, and ends with a comparison table and an agent-loop checklist.

Same exploration path · Agent core

Reading Alex Ewerlöf's Coding is NOT solved: creation got cheaper, but NFRs, functional correctness, and verification ownership did not. Harness, Skills, AGENTS.md, and MCP wrap shortcomings—they do not erase who owns the delivery.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A deep read of arXiv:2609.30662: naming the agent-loop failure of low-value persistence after the goal is met as LLM Parkinsonism; GEC v0.2 separates proposal from project-level stop authority and cuts ~36% tokens at near-equal success on a matched-candidate benchmark. Mechanisms and a harness checklist.

Same exploration path · Agent core

Reading Purdue arXiv:2609.30725: across 1,200 Claude Code and Mini-SWE-Agent trajectories, three behaviors hit 79–98% of tasks and up to 22.75% of task cost; structure-aware retrieval can raise cost 28.14%; developer-designed skills cut ~2× agent-synthesized skills.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A deep read of arXiv:2609.18366 CHASE—automatic harness optimization can exploit benchmark-wide shortcuts on a fixed released protocol; a Challenger searches executable protocol transforms with a validity firewall and held-out confirmation, retaining released gains while cutting gain destruction on Syn-Ledger and OfficeQA.

Same exploration path · Agent core

Reading arXiv:2609.29095: Limbo (6 services, 12 faults, 25,930 episodes) shows exactly-once for LLM agent side effects lives in the model when read-back can resolve outcomes, and in the tool contract under in-flight/redelivery faults—idempotency keys cut duplicates 28%→4%; distrust agent success reports.

Same exploration path · Agent core

Reading arXiv:2609.30266: most local coding-agent harnesses store session traces where the agent can delete or forge them—under direct asks, malicious skills, and reward pressure. Audit integrity needs a host-external append-only interceptor. Contrasts Hard Stop (contain actions) with containing history.

Same exploration path · Agent core

Reading Anthropic’s guest post on Fable 5.1 inside Claude Science: planar N=4 SYM nine-loop hexagon amplitudes via an explicit science harness and minimal human intervention—harness × agent-loop, not a bigger-model story.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A deep read of Accenture arXiv:2609.28919—enterprise coding-agent bills are often blamed on “expensive models,” but the paper moves the blame to harness defaults; cache-safe routing with Jev recovers about 14–21% of model spend in a 10k-seat emulation, with a sovereignty ladder from observe to own.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A deep read of arXiv:2609.29808 Hard Stop—what out-of-band POSIX/kernel preemption and Dual-Sided Epistemic Andon require when URL allowlists, passive SIEM, and app-layer LLM guardrails are not enough.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A deep read of arXiv:2609.29769—typed classifier Jev vs three flash LLM judges on nine panels and 5,003 pairs: accuracy seldom separates, cost/latency gaps hit 29–325× and 30–220×, and correlated errors cap a cheap-first cascade at about +1.5pp.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A deep read of arXiv:2609.29921 SpecHarness—compiling visible specs into verifiable obligations so agents propose while an external runtime commits state and finalization from qualified evidence—contrasted with OpenSpec/SDD and this site’s harness narrative, plus a practical proposal–authority checklist.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A source-checked read of Strands harness and the Harness SDK—how they turn context management, sessions, tool gates, and loop control into a product—plus a selection checklist against ECC, Growing Harness, and Claude Code harness.

Same exploration path · Agent core

arXiv:2609.27678 compares Jev and nine hosted/local models on ContractNLI: cost, latency, baseline accuracy, and All-12 persistent correctness rank differently. Close means can hide flips—select on persistent correctness, not accuracy alone.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A practical teardown of alibaba/open-code-review: deterministic engineering owns file selection and positioning; the agent owns deep reasoning. Covers AACR-Bench, delegation mode, CI hooks, copyable patterns, and limits.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A teardown of cloudflare/security-audit-skill: Skill distribution, six audit phases, confirmed / needs_validation / rejected verdicts, adversarial validation, and fail-open behavior without a sandbox—plus install steps and enterprise limits.

Same exploration path · Agent core

A practical, evidence-based guide to Cordis, spatiotemporal composability, revertible effects, reactive coeffects, plugin lifecycles, and the architecture of DeepSeek Harness.

Same exploration path · Agent core

What makes a production agent loop survive the real world? We extract the Agent Harness Pattern from Claude Code's source — a generalizable blueprint for building resilient, self-recovering AI agent runtimes.

This comprehensive analysis examines two dominant methodologies in autonomous software engineering: the Ralph Wiggum Loop (brute-force execution pattern) and Open Spec (structured requirements framework). Discover how these approaches address LLM limitations like "Context Rot" and the "Dumb Zone," and their role in the emerging "Autonomous Stack" that is reshaping software development in 2026.